NAIROBI— Kenya has witnessed intensified public discourse marked by rhetoric that emphasizes ethnic and regional divisions rather than shared national aspirations.
As media practitioners rooted in the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASAL) regions of Northern Kenya, we have a particular responsibility to foster unity, peace, and informed dialogue.
Especially at a moment when the country and the world most needs voices that bridge divides rather than widen them.
After careful internal consultations among our members—journalists, broadcasters, and media professionals dedicated to ethical standards—we collectively concluded that proceeding with the scheduled roundtable interview set for 22 January 2026 with Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
It would not align with our core principles of responsible journalism, national cohesion, and constructive public discourse.
We have closely monitored recent public statements and exchanges that have increasingly taken on a polarizing tone. It often involves framing issues through ethnic and regional lenses at a time when Kenya requires inclusive narratives.
We expressed concern that the format risked descending into unsubstantiated allegations, character attacks and unbalanced exchanges lacking evidence-based engagement.
This decision was not made lightly. We deeply value the role of the media in providing platforms for public figures to address the nation directly and hold power to account.
Northeastern region has the second-highest rate of internet access across the nation, an impressive feat that trails only the capital city, Nairobi.
Communications Authority of Kenya report in 2024 revealed significant progress in digital inclusion within Kenya. According to the findings, more than 60% of residents in the Northeastern counties now have access to the Internet.
Given the large audience we reach, we sought assurances that the discussion would remain respectful, fact-driven, and focused on substantive matters of concern to all Kenyans.
Regrettably, those assurances were not forthcoming in a manner that satisfied our ethical thresholds.Our withdrawal is an exercise in responsible journalism, not censorship.
Media freedom includes the freedom to choose platforms and engagements that uphold truth, fairness, and social harmony.
History shows that unchecked divisive speech can erode trust and fuel tensions—particularly in regions like ours that have long borne the brunt of marginalization and conflict.
We remain committed to promoting professional standards, protecting journalists’ safety, and amplifying stories that build rather than break.
We call on all leaders, communicators, and fellow media houses to prioritize unity and evidence over polarization. Kenya’s future depends on dialogue that heals, not harms.
Yunis Dekow,Secretary General— Northern Kenya Media Practitioners (NKMP).
